Let us all Care for the
Disabled in the Society.
This is what Justice David Majanja said in
his judgment in the case of Paul AnupPkiach &Another versus Attorney General & Another (2012) eKLR:
’’The current physical structure of the Milimani Law courts is such that it is
a hindrance to justice seekers owing to the physical barriers that make it a
herculean task for persons with disabilities to access the courts. Some of the
problems recognized are as follows; Access to the Entry Lobby of the Building
is restrictive to people with wheel chairs since there is a step to the
reception area. The witness boxes in various courts are raised by a platform of
200mm from the general floor which makes it difficult for the physically
challenged particularly those on wheel chairs to access the stand. The parking
bays are set at a lower level to the general ground which poses a challenge to
move to the raised ground over the concrete kerb stone. Some of the entrances
to the court rooms are not wide enough for wheel chair.’’ I do not know whether
the situation at Milimani law courts has now been rectified. However, what I
know is that what the judge said is reflected in various court buildings across
the country.
It is ironical that the
judiciary is in the forefront in violating the rights of the disabled.However,
the judiciary need not worry as it has the company of fellow violators across
the society. We have seen many county governments spent billions to buy ambulances
for hospitals in their counties. Anyone will agree that is a good thing. Yet a
visit to these hospitals will tell you that they cannot be accessed by someone
on a wheel chair or blind because of the design of the building and lack of
signage in Braille. I can confidently say all Public service vehicles cannot be
accessed by the disabled in society yet the relevant stakeholders like the
Matatu Owners association are only concerned about pimping their matatus and
fussing over the cashless payment system.
We celebrate the
innovation of mobile money transfer services but we do not care or ask why
there are no subsidized screen readers for the blind. Yet we know that the
service providers will not make losses because they have invested in these
subsidized screen readers. The disabled are still unable to access the ATM s of
many banks across the country even as the banks pride themselves in being the
best.
As we prepare for the
digital migration we have witnessed concerned television station fight to
protect their investments worth of billions. They have every right to do so.
However, it should not be forgotten that apart from the national broadcaster,
only one of the stations has sign language interpretation during newscast and
the airing of programmes of national importance.
Making profit should not
be our only business. We should stop the avarice and care about the vulnerable
amongst us. It is not enough to say we have employed the disabled in our
companies and the different government ministries. It is not enough for the
government to say thirty percent of government contracts are for the disabled.
Just like it is useless for most companies and the government to call
themselves equal opportunity employers when their websites cannot be accessed
by blind people. Let us all play our part.